Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Blog Post

October 7, 2019

Why Care About Value vs. Price?

As professionals, we generally see entrepreneurs and closely held business owners do a great job of managing their business growth. What they sometimes don’t do a great job of is planning for what happens to the business after their death. Where does the business interest go upon the death of the owner? For what price? And at what value?

Why should we care about value vs. price? We should care because there is “price,”  which is the cost of purchasing shares from a decedent’s estate, and then there is “value,” which is the dollar value imputed to those same shares for estate-tax purposes. As you may have guessed, price and  value are not always the same. When they are, it’s great. When they’re not, it can spell trouble.

In many businesses, the owners have an agreement that upon the death of one shareholder, the surviving shareholder(s) or the business will purchase the deceased shareholder’s shares for an agreed-upon price. The agreement usually calls for the shareholders to agree upon a price—for instance, once a year—and record that price in the minute book or business records. That is the price the surviving shareholder(s) or the business will pay to the decedent’s estate for the shares.

For estate-tax purposes, however, tax authorities are not necessarily interested in the price. They care about the value of the shares and, in particular, the fair market value (FMV) of the shares as of the date of death. This FMV is the amount that will be taxed in the decedent’s estate despite the price paid to the decedent’s estate for the shares. When the FMV is above the price, the estate is taxed on a larger amount than it receives. In some extreme instances, the tax incurred can be even greater than the price paid. This outcome can be minimized or even avoided by engaging in some proactive planning prior to death.

Featured Media

Alerts

EPA Lists Two New "Forever Chemicals" Under CERCLA

Alerts

NYS Governor Hochul Announces Final RFP for New Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics

Alerts

The Second Department Affirms Successful Storm in Progress Defense of Slip and Fall Case

Alerts

The New York FY 2025 Budget – CDPAP FIs Under Threat

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Anderson, Beauchamp, Murray, Angeles, Monegro, and Bullock—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

Updated Bulletin on Tracking Technologies in the Health Care Industry

We're Growing in DC!

We’re excited to announce Barclay Damon’s combination with Washington DC–based Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram. SLS’s 10 lawyers, three paralegals, and four administrative staff will join Barclay Damon while maintaining their current office in DC’s central business district. Our clients will benefit from SLS’s corporate, real estate, finance, and construction litigation experience and national energy-industry profile, and their clients from our full range of services.

Read More

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out