Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

July 24, 2024

NYS PSC Modifies Pole Attachment Rules to Accelerate Broadband and Cellular Service Deployment

On July 18, 2024, the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) issued an Order modifying its rules regarding pole attachments to accelerate broadband and cellular service deployment across the state. 

Generally, poles throughout New York State are owned by electric utilities and telecommunication companies or are jointly owned by those entities. Pole attachers are typically telecommunication and cable companies who submit applications to pole owners for the use of limited pole space and the license to use these existing utility poles. The pole attachment process between pole owners and attachers has at times been tedious and subject to disagreement. The recent Order aims to speed up the attachment process and does so by enacting the following changes: 

Adopts New Timelines for Expedited Dispute Resolution

Currently, when a dispute arises between pole owners and pole attachers, there is not a concrete timeline for resolution. In order to cure the unknowns about the regulatory process, the PSC establishes a 90-day “shot clock” for dispute resolution once a complaint is formally filed by either a pole attacher or pole owner. The 90-day timeframe may be extended by the Secretary, as necessary. 
 
Establishes a Collaborative Working Group

In an effort to increase collaboration between pole attachers and owners, the Order establishes a working group comprised of all interested stakeholders, including all telephone and cable companies, pole owners, and pole attachers. The working group will meet on a regular basis, as determined by staff, and will commence within 90 days of the Order. 
   
Required Annual Reporting  

Pole owners are now required to file annual reports detailing third-party attachment requests. Reports must include: 

  • the number of attachment requests; 
  • the processing time for each request and whether it is make-ready required; and 
  • details on the number of completed requests per year, including the number of poles sought for attachment, new attachments licensed, and the number of poles replaced for the year. 

Consideration of Alternative Attachments, Including Pole-Top Attachments

In a further effort to modernize pole attachments, the PSC now allows for certain types of attachments on a case-by-case basis, including pole-top attachments, strand-mounted attachments and overlashing, boxing and bracketing, extension arms, and temporary attachments. Further, pole owners are no longer allowed to implement blanket bans on certain methods of pole attachments and must provide detailed reasoning for denying a pole attacher request. However, the Order does preserve the electric space on the poles for electric facilities only, with the exception of pole-top attachments. 

Allows for “One-Touch Make-Ready” (OTMR) Attachments 

OTMR is where a new attacher has the option of using a single qualified contractor to perform all (or most) of the make-ready work to move existing facilities on the pole and attach the new attacher’s facilities in a single pole visit. The Order now allows attachers, according to Federal Communications Commission rules, to use OTMR attachments where they do not conflict with collective bargaining agreements. 

Mandatory Post-Construction Inspections

To increase transparency during the pole attachment process, post-construction inspections are now required for all attachments. Attachments applied for 60 days after the Order will be subject to post-construction inspection. 

Attorneys in Barclay Damon’s Regulatory Practice Area will continue to monitor pole attachment matters and other developments affecting the telecommunications and electric utility industry in New York State. 

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Ekin Senlet, Regulatory Practice Area co-chair, at esenlet@barclaydamon.com; Dan Krzykowski, associate, at dkrzykowski@barclaydamon.com; or another member of the firm’s Regulatory Practice Area.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

NYS Department of Health Issues Consumer Protection Guidance on Payments for Health Care Services

Alerts

Stay Away From the Debtor? An Overview of the Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy

Alerts

Second Department: Defendants Are Entitled to Collateral Source Hearing for "To-Be Obtained" Insurance Coverage Under the ACA

Alerts

What OMH Providers Need to Know About the Proposed Amendments to the Licensing Regulations in 14 NYCRR Part 551

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Primitivo Robles, Hannibal Wheatley, Valeria Jacobs, Marlelis Hernandez, and Omar Rodriguez—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

Hitting the Reset Button: Second Circuit Decision Highlights Significant Statute of Limitations Issues for New York Foreclosure Plaintiffs

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out