Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

News

January 25, 2023

Ari Kwiatkowski Interviewed for Buffalo Business First Article on the Consequences of Violating a Travel Ban for Employers and Employees

Ari Kwiatkowski, counsel, was interviewed for the Buffalo Business First article “Driving in a Travel Ban: What Are the Consequences for Employers and Their Employees?” In light of recent deadly winter storms in Western New York, the article explores the consequences people may face for violating a travel ban and how employees and employers can prepare for future travel bans.

A state of emergency declared by executive order from the governor, county executive, or mayor should be taken seriously. If caught, violating a travel ban can mean getting a ticket amounting to a Class B misdemeanor with a $500 fine and even a maximum of three months of incarceration, which can all likely be negotiated down.

Some employers may ask employees to violate a travel ban to get to work. Ari said, “If a client calls me during the storm and says they’re in the suburbs where the driving ban was lifted but they have an employee in the city that was still under the driving ban, I would say, you do not want to take any adverse action against the employee for not being able to come to work.” She also said that she doesn’t recommend employers force employees to take paid time off to cover any missed time as a result of the storm due to it being beyond anyone’s control.

Ari continued, “It’s definitely not advisable if you’re an employer to force or mandate an employee to violate a travel ban, because at that point you’re encouraging a violation of the law.” She advised employers to keep track of the weather, travel bans, and where their employees are commuting from in order to make informed decisions about weather-related closures.
 

Featured Media

Alerts

ERISA Forfeiture Lawsuits: Navigating the Emerging Legal Landscape

Alerts

EU Leads the Way on Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Alerts

End of An Era: SCOTUS Overturns Chevron After 40 Years of Deference to Administrative Agencies

Alerts

SCOTUS Rejects Proposed Release of Sackler Family From Purdue Pharma Chapter 11 Plan as Not Permitted by the Bankruptcy Code

Alerts

NYS Appellate Court Reverses and Holds Liability Insurer Owed Duty to Defend to Policyholder in Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Alerts

New York State's Secret Sauce: Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out