Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Blog Post

November 22, 2013

PADEP Has Jurisdiction To Decide "Forced Pooling" Request

Forced pooling in Pennsylvania is a controversial issue and one that remained largely untested until now.  Pennsylvania’s pooling law was enacted in 1961 and does not apply to the Marcellus Shale.  It does, however, apply to the deeper Utica Shale and allows an operator to gather landowners into a unit who have not voluntarily entered into an oil and gas lease.  One of the questions under Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Conservation Law was who decides whether to grant an operator’s application to force pool parcels into a spacing unit?

On November 20, 2013, the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board (PAEHB) decided that question and ruled that it does not have “original jurisdiction” to approve requests for forced pooling.  Rather, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) must first decide whether a drilling company can force pool Utica Shale gas properties without the consent of all owners in the unit.

The PAEHB’s decision stemmed from a request by Hilcorp Energy Co. to establish a drilling unit by pooling property on a 3,267 acre stretch of land in northwest Pennsylvania.  Interestingly, Hilcorp had all but 35 acres under lease.  When Hilcorp filed the request this past July, the PADEP responded that “it did not have the authority to act on Hilcorp’s application and that an application seeking an order for well spacing or drilling units must be submitted to the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board.”  The PAEHB disagreed and ultimately determined that the PADEP must first decide such request and then, only after it does so can the PAEHB hear an appeal.

Hilcorp’s request now goes back to the PADEP for consideration.  If granted, it would represent the first time that a company has used force pooling in Pennsylvania to facilitate horizontal hydraulic fracturing.

Featured Media

Alerts

ERISA Forfeiture Lawsuits: Navigating the Emerging Legal Landscape

Alerts

EU Leads the Way on Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Alerts

End of An Era: SCOTUS Overturns Chevron After 40 Years of Deference to Administrative Agencies

Alerts

SCOTUS Rejects Proposed Release of Sackler Family From Purdue Pharma Chapter 11 Plan as Not Permitted by the Bankruptcy Code

Alerts

NYS Appellate Court Reverses and Holds Liability Insurer Owed Duty to Defend to Policyholder in Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Alerts

New York State's Secret Sauce: Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out