Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Blog Post

October 7, 2019

Why Care About Value vs. Price?

As professionals, we generally see entrepreneurs and closely held business owners do a great job of managing their business growth. What they sometimes don’t do a great job of is planning for what happens to the business after their death. Where does the business interest go upon the death of the owner? For what price? And at what value?

Why should we care about value vs. price? We should care because there is “price,”  which is the cost of purchasing shares from a decedent’s estate, and then there is “value,” which is the dollar value imputed to those same shares for estate-tax purposes. As you may have guessed, price and  value are not always the same. When they are, it’s great. When they’re not, it can spell trouble.

In many businesses, the owners have an agreement that upon the death of one shareholder, the surviving shareholder(s) or the business will purchase the deceased shareholder’s shares for an agreed-upon price. The agreement usually calls for the shareholders to agree upon a price—for instance, once a year—and record that price in the minute book or business records. That is the price the surviving shareholder(s) or the business will pay to the decedent’s estate for the shares.

For estate-tax purposes, however, tax authorities are not necessarily interested in the price. They care about the value of the shares and, in particular, the fair market value (FMV) of the shares as of the date of death. This FMV is the amount that will be taxed in the decedent’s estate despite the price paid to the decedent’s estate for the shares. When the FMV is above the price, the estate is taxed on a larger amount than it receives. In some extreme instances, the tax incurred can be even greater than the price paid. This outcome can be minimized or even avoided by engaging in some proactive planning prior to death.

Featured Media

Alerts

ERISA Forfeiture Lawsuits: Navigating the Emerging Legal Landscape

Alerts

EU Leads the Way on Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Alerts

End of An Era: SCOTUS Overturns Chevron After 40 Years of Deference to Administrative Agencies

Alerts

SCOTUS Rejects Proposed Release of Sackler Family From Purdue Pharma Chapter 11 Plan as Not Permitted by the Bankruptcy Code

Alerts

NYS Appellate Court Reverses and Holds Liability Insurer Owed Duty to Defend to Policyholder in Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Alerts

New York State's Secret Sauce: Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out