Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

February 12, 2009

New York's Highest Court Reverses Ruling that Imposed Forfeiture of $750,000 for Failure to Timely Submit a Judgment.

Rule 202.48 of the Uniform Rules for the New York State Trial Courts requires the winner of a decision containing a directive to "submit" or "settle" the order or judgment to so act within sixty days. Under the Rule, failure to timely submit under such circumstances and without "good cause," constitutes an abandonment of the judgment.

In a widely publicized 2007 decision in Farkas v. Farkas, which involved a contentious matrimonial matter, the First Department held that a $750,000 award must be forfeited because the plaintiff failed to timely submit a judgment under Rule 202.48.

The Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal and recently issued its decision. New York's Highest Court overturned the First Department's decision on the basis that that an earlier decision of the trial court authorized the award "without further order." In the eyes of the Court of Appeals, this language made the settlement process set forth in the Rule unnecessary.

To avoid the potential forfeiture of an award and favorable decision, the safer practice is to ensure that proposed orders are submitted with in the 60 day time period set forth in Rule 202.48.

If you require further information regarding the information presented in this Legal Alert and its impact on your organization, please contact any of the members of the Practice Area.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

ERISA Forfeiture Lawsuits: Navigating the Emerging Legal Landscape

Alerts

EU Leads the Way on Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Alerts

End of An Era: SCOTUS Overturns Chevron After 40 Years of Deference to Administrative Agencies

Alerts

SCOTUS Rejects Proposed Release of Sackler Family From Purdue Pharma Chapter 11 Plan as Not Permitted by the Bankruptcy Code

Alerts

NYS Appellate Court Reverses and Holds Liability Insurer Owed Duty to Defend to Policyholder in Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Alerts

New York State's Secret Sauce: Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out