Aerospace Engineer and Patent Lawyer, Barry Manna, Joins Hiscock & Barclay in Syracuse
Syracuse, New York – November 18, 2014 – Hiscock & Barclay, LLP welcomes intellectual property lawyer, Barry F. Manna, as Of Counsel in the Syracuse office.
Manna is a registered patent attorney and will be a member of the firm’s Patents & Prosecution Practice Area. Manna brings over a decade of experience in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret matters to the firm. Prior to joining Hiscock & Barclay, he was a senior associate at Harris Beach PLLC, where he worked with business leaders to develop and execute global patent strategies aligned with client’s products and services. In that capacity, he also served as consulting in-house intellectual property counsel for a corporate client with global operations and an extensive international patent portfolio. Manna was also an intellectual property attorney for Majama Muldoon Blasiak and Sullivan LLP, McCormick Paulding and Huber LLP, and United Technologies Corporation.
Manna received his law degree from Western New England College School of Law. Prior to becoming an attorney, Manna graduated from Clarkson University with a degree in mechanical engineering and worked for United Technologies Corp. in the aerospace industry as a development engineer on propulsion and fuel cell systems.
He is admitted to practice in Connecticut and is registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, listed as a “Top 250 Firm” by The National Law Journal, is a full-service, 210-attorney law firm, with offices throughout the major cities of New York State, as well as in Boston, Washington, Newark, N.J. and Toronto, providing comprehensive legal and business counsel to a diverse client base in 30 practice areas.
- A Second New York State Appellate Court Rejects the Department of Labor’s “13-Hour Rule” and Finds That Home Care Attendants Working 24-Hour Shifts Must Be Compensated for All 24-Hours
- A New Pitfall for Licensors of Multicomponent Inventions – the Supreme Court’s Life Techs Decision
- A Properly Executed “Release From Responsibility For Discharge” Form May Not Actually Release a Hospital
- 2016 Year in Review